![]() ![]() It is way for allowing us to understand our own selve(s) ~ at manifesting rations (food) into purpose or intended rationality. It is and can be thought of as applied philosophy. What are the biggest proxies for these “individuality”? Nutritional Science and Fitness. We may not be able to truly prevent metabolic syndromes or any crimes or violent behaviours collectively but we can accept (inevitably) that any causal progress of this pathology is individually case / circumstance / time and / context – specific. Perhaps not collectively, but we can start thinking about our own solutions individually. ![]() Resilience, discipline and pragmatic – stoicism. That also – we have some mutual degrees of self-incentivisations for self-authenticity for us to work FROM – to remind and redefine – what enough means. ![]() This is already reflective to us that these are all we have left to work WITH. W e still have Resources to begin with to distribute and to give. Economics is defined as the management of the household. Neo8iam Failure at privatising the “self” / what “enough” means.Įnter Economics. Why is it ‘in’ us? Because it’s constant. That reminder – happens to be from within each of our own “selves”. Effectively reversing our meaningful reconciling on the “why’s” behind all this pursuit in the first place. So we need somehow – a constant reminder on why we’ve forgotten this meaningful reconciling. However beneath all this pursuit we continued DIVERTING such Progress to something else far more destructive. From willow tree bark to Aspirin, and low-dose naltrexones. Interestingly, no other point of civilisation since dawn of human first invention as ideological to then instrumental have advanced us so quickly in a space of no more than few hundred years. One clue we could “start” looking “from”, would be our prior history, wouldn’t it? Perhaps how we’ve managed the potentials of ourselves, as factors of “ignorance”. There must be something we’ve either over looked, or under looked. So we know that Resources, in every quantified sense – was never a problem. Let’s put that quote into perspective from what we’ve learned from Universe 25. You effectively are free to choose adopt or adapt at your own volition and responsibility for your own survival, contentment and livelihood. “ Where is the pragmatic conclusion in all of this?” As disclaimer I simply assert that the following are only general speech from my own mind over what I consider believe-able and pragmatic. Now we are arriving into this third (and final) part of this write up – as some may call it juvenile – attempt to address the biggest question of all that remains anxiously silenced. And rewards (the “product/s” and “outcomes”). Meanings – the why and how – the biology and physicalities). Lastly, our confusion over what constitutes “meaningful life” or “meaningful work” I believe can be addressed by reconciling a symbiotic relationship between Biology and Productivity.…Irrespective if you are a”Man” or a “woman” or inbetween – nobody is benign.…That “Religion” – is merely a scripted paternalism of orderly coercion.Having shared my thoughts as previously published in part 2: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |